The first physical gathering of the Rejects in Postie's shed of war in 2023 saw us duel in a Napoleonic encounter between the French and the Austrians. For a much better report than this one go to Big Lee's blog.
I don't have the army lists. However, it would be fair to say that the armies mirrored each other in terms of units. But, the French had several elite infantry units while the Austrians enjoyed heavier and slightly better cavalry.
For the French were Surjit, Lee and Mark.
For the Austrians were David, Ray and me.
My first analysis of this game was that the symmetric nature of the armies made what should have been a fairly quick game turn into a cagey affair with neither side wanting to commit themselves to risks. So, the first few turns I'll skip past, as the action really took place in the last 90 minutes out of a five and a half hour game.
The forces deployed. Both armies with cavalry on both flanks and infantry in the centre. |
Closer view of the Austrian deployment. |
All along both lines, the armies crept towards each other over a series of turns, as can be seen in the following series of photos.
One defining moment at this point was the French light infantry brigade gained control of the hill straddling the centre of the battlefield, by beating off an attack by Austrian uhlans and ejecting jagers from the woods. However, what we all knew was that this battle would be won or lost on the flanks not in the centre. It needed the cavalry to engage.
With opposing brigades of heavy cavalry and cuirassiers smashing into each other the honours appeared to be even. However, the defeated Austrian were thrown back further in rout, whilst the battered French were merely disordered and withdrew slightly. So, as it would turn out, still well placed to deal a further blow to Austria's finest.
So it was, that we called the battle concluded. Stuart then proceeded to tally points. Regardless of the score the photo below really shows this as a French victory from the position they had won over the Austrians
Analysis
Well played the French, especially the cavalry commanders who handled their deployment and horse artillery well.
This should have been a game that was fought quickly. It was not. I can only put that down to no one wanting to commit when both armies mirrored each other so much. I believe the outcome would have been the same, and possibly without the French infantry centre being so damaged. It was enjoyable. The banter was top quality, Lee's tantrum was highly amusing (Ray will have something to write about that), and the action (when it came in the last 2 turns) was thrilling.
We all went home tired, but happy.
Oh God, ANOTHER Austrian defeat! Looked like a great game and in reality, if you Austrian cavalry commanders had had the same luck of the dice as the infantry commander did in the last-minute charge, it would have been quite a different result!
ReplyDeleteAlas, the gods of war were not on our side.... well certainly not with the cavalry.
DeleteAs one of the French Cavalry commanders I think both I and Mark were being careful not to give even more of an advantage to the better Austrian cavalry. From the beginning our objective was "don't loose the flanks". Our slow motion tactics may not have been exciting but id did mean that Mark could deploy better from a poor position and I was able to equalise the melee on the right.
ReplyDeleteAs for my 'tantrum', I prefer to call it a 'protest' at a dubious umpire decision. After a decade with the Rejects (observing their 'protests' at close hand) I know that challenging decisions with Postie works in your favour more often than not. I regret nothing 🤣
Odd then that your commander wanted Mark to move forward more aggressively!
DeleteWith a plus to your initiative rolls, you were (and did) have control of who moved and charged first. So, being careful didn't make difference to the outcome or equality of match. In fact, the French could afford to get close quicker to nullify the possibility of an Austrian counter-charge. Which is what happened... eventually.
Nonetheless, you played well and achieved a deserved win.
Beautiful table and an enjoyable battle report, Richard. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteUpon which part of the Abensberg battle was this scenario based? This does not look familiar to me.
Lee's Tantrum? Please tell us more!
Thank you Jonathan. Table, armies and game all courtesy of Stuart. I'm unable to identify the part of the battle, if indeed it really is.
DeleteAs for Lee. It wasn't really a tantrum. He protested over an umpire's decision. This was so out of character that we all took the opportunity to have some fun at Lee's expense. All part of what was the good natured banter that marked the occasion.
Great looking battle report sir!
ReplyDeleteBest regards
Thank you Michal.
DeleteExcellent report Richard, it was a very strange but entertaining game.
ReplyDeleteYes Ray. Strange and entertaining... eventually.
DeleteAn enjoyable AAR Richard. Five and a half hours is a solid effort even if the first few turns were more about manouevre, so no wonder everyone went home tired.
ReplyDeleteThanks Lawrence. I was exhausted.
DeleteGreat looking figures and table.
ReplyDeleteCheers, I'll pass that onto Stuart.
DeleteSad to see an Austrian defeat but most importantly you all had fun. It seems there was a lot of cagey movement for most of the game with a mad flurry at the end. A bit too long a game for me playing solo, but when with friends, the time does fly:).
ReplyDeleteIt is the case that this is valuable time spent with friends.
DeleteLooks a great setup and a good game, I have enjoyed reading all the AARs from you, Lee and Ray. I had assumed that every group would have at least one player whose default setting is to shout 'charge!' and attack from the get-go : maybe your group needs someone like that!
ReplyDeleteThanks David. We do have one of those players, but this time his natural response was suppressed.
Delete