I invited the Rejects into my cellar of chaos to remotely fight a fictional battle based on the French Revolutionary Wars using units and commanders from the Italy campaign of 1796.
Figures - 6mm MDF from Commission Figurines
Rules - Volley and Bayonet
The aim of this encounter was many fold:
- To have a good time.
- To become more familiar with Volley and Bayonet rules.
- To lay out the table, game and context as if it was part of a campaign (I am looking to start one soon, but need to iron some bits out).
To this end, I rolled up a table based on an encounter.
To inject some fog of war I did the following:
- Assumed poor reconnaissance which meant that neither side knew the strength and composition of the other.
- Instructed both sides to provide me with orders for their forces moving onto the battlefield and deploying. I would then execute those orders simultaneously on the table before the day of battle, with all troops halting 12 inches or line of sight from opposing troops, whichever is shorter. From the positions their troops end up is where the game will start.
After a few
weeks of marching and counter-marching the Imperial Austrian and Republican
French armies collide somewhat unintentionally near the small town of Quisais,
with the opponents arriving from the northwest and southwest respectively.
The town of
Quisais holds no strategic value other than its highly respected
boulangerie. The engagement is all about
forcing the enemy to retreat, by either breaking the army or threatening their
line of communication (LOC).
Thankfully, for the picnicking officers,
the encounter starts after lunch at 2pm.
The sun sets at 8pm, with it being dark by 9pm.
Both sides
may move their forces on from their designated LOC. The assumption for this game is that all
units have already shaken out of march column.
View of the battlefield that the opposing armies have to march on to. |
The players were asked to see this game as part of
a campaign where each side is trying to protect the flank of their main army,
and possibly turn the enemy’s flank. A
victory would have a catastrophic impact on the enemy’s strategic position and
possibly force a withdrawal. But a defeated and badly mauled army could make your main army very vulnerable.
Victory conditions
The side with the most points wins: 1 point for holding your own LOC, 1 point for
holding the opponent’s LOC, and 1 point for each enemy division exhausted (2 if
morale has collapsed). Alternatively,
when one side decides to withdraw to maintain the integrity of its wider
mission and still has at least 33% of its divisions in good order.
In the
event of a draw, a second day of battle may occur. In a campaign this may see the arrival of
reinforcements during the course of the day.
The Armies
The Austrian army:
Jonathan, Steve and Surjit
The French commanders:
David, Lee and Ray
The DeploymentA view from the French advancing towards the hill and Jonathan's grenadiers. |
With 2 divisions with their morale collapsed, heavy casualties on Sandos' division in the centre, and a threatened line of communication the French commanders decide to withdraw. |
The pregame deployment phase worked well, in my opinion. The game was swift, bloody and decisive. The players seemed to come away with the correct notion that just because you can move long, doesn't mean that you should. Having said that, I am considering whether to halve the movement rates. this is reflect both the closer starting proximity of the armies, and to take into account that my table is only 4 feet wide. A change may permit some manoeuvring during the game.
The players were all extremely kind and patient with me, and aided me tremendously by reminding me of rules.
The French were perhaps a little too bold with their cavalry in launching light against medium cavalry, and may have been a little cramped in the area between the woods.
The players seemed to have a good time - one aim fulfilled.
We all know the rules a little better - another aim ticked.
The players thought in campaign and strategic terms - tick!
A big plus for me, was completing a remote game to a decision in one sitting. I think as the Rejects become more familiar with Volley and Bayonet the games will move along faster.
This was a first trial with Volley and Bayonet Road to Glory. I've only used the original version in the past. My verdict... I like them very much.
The game was great fun, Richard! Thanks so much for hosting and for offering me a set at your remote table. Very much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI was shocked (shocked, I say!) at how quickly the game was over. We played only one complete turn before the French decided discretion was the better part of valor. V&B offers a brutally fragile combat engine.
Thanks Jonathan, and you're welcome.
DeleteIt was a surprise. However, given the large movement rates, and ground/time scales perhaps I shoulkd not be too surprised. After all the rules were conceived in order to fight big battles in an evening. I was also at fault in allowing the pre-game deployment to put everything immediately in charge range. I am reflecting on how I amend this... reduced movement rates? more limited extent of deployment? We shall see.
Yes, the rules are brutal. However, firefights and especially melees are risky ventures to undertake. I think it is a credit to the abstractions in the rules that I, and the Rejects who have played Volley and Bayonet before, feel happy with the outcomes.
I think that everyone present has learned about the rules, but more importantly how to conduct their forces with these rules.
Great looking game sir!
ReplyDeleteThank you very much Michal.
DeleteA highly-respected boulangerie is definitely worth fighting over. I imagine that trying to instruct remote players in anew set of rules is doubly difficult. Nice that you have a patient group there who are all willing to give Volley and Bayonet a go.
ReplyDeleteThank you Lawrence. A well baked croissant and baguette should always be held in high esteem.
DeleteI am very lucky with my friends.
By arming players with a solidly comprehensive QRS (which Richard did) and providing a brief rules’ overview beforehand, teaching a new set of rules is not so difficult. You must have attentive students, though. Having never played V&B before, by the middle of Turn 1 most of it all made sense. Now, developing viable tactics takes much longer.
DeleteFirst and foremost, Richard, a crushing Austrian win - outstanding! Any rule set that can achieve that, has my vote! Do the Austrians have a load of negative modifiers to contend with in V&B, or are they treated as being the equal of their opponents? I must admit, even as an AAR, it seemed immodestly quick in coming to a conclusion - one full move and the French were toast! :) I guess one advantage of remote gaming is Ray and co had not spent an hour travelling to the game, just to be overwhelmed in one move!
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that you approve of the outcome Keith.
DeleteThe Austrians do not have to contend with lots of negatives. The armies can be different to reflect the period, but there is no national bias that assumes inferiority. However, if you want a very large low morale grade army against a small elite force then you can.
It was a very quick game. If I may refer you to my reply to Jonathan this gives more thoughts on this.
If this was a face to face game, we would have had a chat, reset the table and played the game again with reduced movement (or some change) to compare. So, no feeling of wasted travelling.
T'was a very bloody game, 100% correct we pushed forward way to fast. I'd like to play V&B with the shorter movement rates, I think that would improve and slow the game down a little and perhaps, make it better??? We'll have to try it that way first just to get the idea. Great game though Rich,
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it Ray. Perhaps it is giving you ideas for playing the Almanza battle?
DeleteI'm ahead of you Ray. You should already have information about a refight.
A fine game there Richard and great to see and Austrian win for once! I like the pre-game movement phase but I think reduced movement rates would be a good move. We play BPII and use the half-scale movement, which is still generous, but is not always wise to move as far as you can. Also we use the ACW supplement rule that you cannot fire if you move more than once. For us this give a much better game and a turn or two of manouevre before the action is joined.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve. We have already made plans to refight with reduced movement rates. I'll let you all know how it goes.
DeleteI think even with full movement, the players now know that just because you can move big doesn't mean that you should. Thus the game would probably be different anyway.